felt his wonder woman was a bit OVER written
That was the style at the time, apparently.
I'm in the process of sorting through my collection, trying to pare down the (now) 9 longboxes to 6 or less (incidentally, a depressingly easy task). What I'm noticing is that comics from the 80s through the early 90s (when I gave up) were incredibly verbose. Sometimes I even wonder how they fit pictures in at all. Recently I bought the Walt Simonson
Thor Omnibus (which I love!) and it's the same thing; study it a panel and a time and there's lots of great artwork, but hold it at arm's length and it looks like a page of text with doodles squeezed into the margins. I think it all started with Chris Claremont on the X-Men; that guy would never limit himself to 50 words if the page could hold 500. Much as I dislike the "less for your money" trend towards "decompression" these days, it does make it jarring to go back and read the old stuff.
As far as Perez on WW, I did like the nods to Greek mythology, and in general the sense of tension and danger he managed to get into a book that's not known for either. But there was also a "Mary Worth" feel to a lot of it, with Diana's middle-aged mentor and her teenage daughter, neither of whose names I can remember. Something always feels "off" when a man tries to write female characters, though thankfully in this case not as "off" as say Bob Haney trying to write teenagers.
Anyway, whatever curiosity I may have had over Perez' return to Superman pretty much went out the window with the preview image released last week. Good luck to him; I'm investing in more "Chronicles".