Reiterating a few things discussed in a
previous thread:
When I think of the reasons I like the classic Superman, many of them have to do with the aesthetic aspects --the "look" of Superman comics. So, my favourite artists are those who exemplofy some aspect of the house style at DC. A mix of the cartoony and the professional advertising art/adventure comic strip/illustrator styles. Besides the classic linework of Curt Swan and the extremely loveable and clunkily iconic Boring, the other artists from the same time period that I love include Jim Mooney, George Papp, Dick Sprang, Shaffenberger, Shuster and the Shuster studio, etc, etc.
My list would not include anyone who came to the comics after 1970, since dynamic, innovative layouts in the Neal Adams tradition (and I would put George Perez in that category, as well as Garcia Lopez) are really not part of that more-or-less static artisitic tradition --although I do have a soft spot for Neal Adams' Ali book. Which is not to say the older artists were not innovative or dynamic. They were, only in a different way. By the same token, although the dynamic innovator supreme, Jack Kirby, worked on Superman-related stories in the 1970s, he qualifies as neither fish nor fowl in this context. A mainstay of the Golden and Silver Age, he defined the look of comics for several publishers (but not for Superman). In the Bronze Age (which he can be credited with starting) his work was still unlike any others --definitely not part of any tradition.
Incidentally, does anyone have a scan of that Boy Commandos cover featuring a Superman parody from 1947 --3 years before Mad? Kirby drew it.