Maybe I'm wrong, but...

[Genis Vell]

I noticed that "For tomorrow" hasn't been very appreciated in the US, despite its place in the top ten (caused by Lee's name on the covers, of course).

Am I wrong?

For now, I can only tell that I really loved this storyline, one of the few post-Crisis stories able to be interesting and complex like the pre-Crisis ones. It's a good story about moral, and the role of Superman in the world: I couldn't hate it!
More comments later.

[Sword of Superman]

I noticed too,my opinion is that is a good story,but i find the way that Azzarello use for telling a story is sometimes too much confusing :? ,perhaps even"unsuitable"for Superman.
Maybe this would be one of the reason that it has not rendered too much popular this story-arc.

[Genis Vell]

Thank you, Sword.

Hey, just one reply? Don't be shy!

[DBN]

Between Superman threatening to destroy the Earth, ecessive brooding, the appearance of yet another Post-Crisis Zod, another interpretation of the Phantom Zone, and confusing plot. It just wasn't worth it. Complete waste of money IMO.

[Klar Ken T5477]

didnt read it

[NotSuper]

It started off well, but got more and more incomprehensible as time went on. I hate to use a buzzword like "decompressed," but "For Tomorrow" was way too decompressed (that is to say the negative version of decompression--sometimes it's helpful for a story to be decompressed).

That being said, I did enjoy Azzarello's Lex Luthor: Man of Steel.