![]() | |||||||||
| |||||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Superman in the 70s |
The
Progenitor Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() i would agree, that is the definative mongul silver age SATANUS is the definative SATANUS ------------------ RACER X - SUPERHEROES THE SUPERHEROES OF ROCK AND ROLL IP: Logged |
India
Ink Member |
![]() ![]() Okay, I'll bite, which Silver Age stories are we talking about?--my sixties collection is not that great. I did pick up an early sixties Action Comic a few months back, at a swap meet, and it seemed to be a Satanus story but I wasn't sure what to make of it. And by the way, for those keeping track, the cover dates on those DCCP issues were Sept. '79 for #13 and Oct. '79 for #14. IP: Logged |
Kal Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() Superman in the 70's.... ! WOW !!! The Proposal was in issue Superman 314, a four parter by Marty Pasko and Swan... Also a great three parter tale featuring a soul-searching Superman !
Superman 317-319 ! Supergirl lies to Superman in order to save Kal from...
himself ??!! Great Stuff ! Action Comics 471-473 anyone ? Action 480-483.. Superman 296-299 are just awesome ! Not to mention the epic Warworld, Mongul, Supergirl, Spectre stories from DC Comics Presents.. And how about those NEAL ADAMS, GARCIA LOPEZ and ROSS ANDRU covers !! Damn !! I'll take those covers ANYTIME over the modern age covers we have today ! IP: Logged |
Jon-El Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() If those issues 317-319 were the ones featuring some nuclear based villain & Garcia Lopez art, I love those!! Something to do with how obsessed Superman had become with saving everyone! That was a great storyline. Proof of what can be done with just three issues. That and the Parasite-Solomon Grundy storyline were among my favorites. Oh and the Metallo stealing Superman's heart story! Great stuff! IP: Logged |
fredflinstonedino Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() quote:
IP: Logged |
India
Ink Member |
![]() ![]() quote: I'm not quite sure what you're asking for here. But in terms of the resolution, in the last three issues of the storyline, it was I Ching who assisted Superman and the sand creature--although I have this funny hope that DC will soon collect the whole thing in a trade paperback and I don't want to go into details for fear of spoiling the ending! I Ching of course was the blind Chinese gentleman and martial arts master who mentored Diana Prince (Wonder Woman without her powers wearing predominantly white mod clothing). Diana appears in these stories, but mainly as a third party, while Ching uses his mystic knowledge to aid the Men of Steel and Sand. IP: Logged |
India
Ink Member |
![]() ![]() Hey that's not a bad idea for the title of such a dream paperback: "Sand & Steel," or "Man of Steel, Man of Sand." IP: Logged |
The
Progenitor Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() you are correct india ink!! as for 317 to 319, wasnt that the stroy where superman believed that he
should attend to matters on earth and let other heroes tend to the
universe ------------------ RACER X - SUPERHEROES THE SUPERHEROES OF ROCK AND ROLL IP: Logged |
India
Ink Member |
![]() ![]() But I was totally duped by this story. I really believed that they were making a major change to the continuity. Everything I believed to be true about Superman was wrong! They really put one over on me. But then a few years later they really did change the continuity for real. IP: Logged |
The
Progenitor Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() i was teetering on the edge with that story but you know what story really had me reeling for months(never good with the #, so bear with me) SUPERMAN 312 TO 316 where a plague hits metropolis and superman investigates and discovers NAM-EK and then discovers AMALAK the KRYPTONIAN KILLER I loved that story , i still reread all the time ------------------ RACER X - SUPERHEROES THE SUPERHEROES OF ROCK AND ROLL IP: Logged |
casselmm47 Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() quote: I LOVE the Seventies Superman.... the last few years I've been filling in holes I have in the 1972 to 1979 range of all the titles. Just today I picked up Action #'s 438 and 439 (mostly for the Atom backups). The Mongul story arc ran from DCCP #'s 27-29, featuring Martian Manhunter, Supergirl, and the Spectre, respectively (GL was in #26, another Starlin issue, but I don't think it was connected to the Mongul story, but, it's been a whiile since I pulled it out of the pressurized comic vault... could be wrong about this...). Didn't Neal Adams do the cover to Action #485, a tribute to the cover
of Superman #233? Another poster thought some of the 1977 Superman (#'s
317-319? Memory fading fast... One of my favorite later discoveries was the Best of DC Digest that collected most of the World of Krypton backup stories. Sure, they may lack the 'punch' some look for in storytelling, but an insight to the Pre-Crisis world. The Action 477-478 and 480-483 issues were my first, (along with #419, a gift from afriend down the road from this then-impressionable 8 year old) and most fondly remembered issues from that era. Why? One word: SUPERMOBILE! Cass IP: Logged |
The
Progenitor Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() ohhhhhhhhhhh i love that story, and also i got the got the supermobile toy, i also loved the KRYPTONOID story, too cool ------------------ RACER X - SUPERHEROES THE SUPERHEROES OF ROCK AND ROLL IP: Logged |
twb Member |
![]() ![]() Wow, I'm not the only one who remembers the Superman of 1974-79. [My junior high to early high school years]. To me that's the real Superman. ------------------ IP: Logged |
India
Ink Member |
![]() ![]() I agree twb. The Sandman Saga was awesome--the early seventies overall were revolutionary times--and a lot of people might say that what followed was not up to that level. But I have to say MY Superman was really the one you're talking about. The Oksner inked Superman. The Superman of Maggin, Bates, and Pasko. The Schwartz and Swan Superman. There was something about that contained world they all created. The Superman from 71-73 was in a state of becoming. But the 74-79 Superman had achieved a certain level--a level that was constantly maintained through those years. Those stories are like comfort food for my soul. Still, the best art team ever on Superman was Swan and Anderson--though Swan/Oksner and Swan/Klein both run a VERY close second in my heart. IP: Logged |
India
Ink Member |
![]() ![]() Hello again, gang. I said I would put up new links for the fortress, starwinds howl, and the like when I had found them. By doing a simple google search on the name Elliot S! Maggin, I found these cool sites. For the fortress, try: For "starwinds howl" itself, try: or: or for the general superboy homepage, try: for the Maggin homepage, try: and for the Amazing World of DC Comics, try: IP: Logged |
Village
Idiot Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() Yeah! This is my favorite recurring thread, and I'm glad to see that Superman Thru the Ages is back on line. India Ink, if you're still around, I was wondering if you could tell me about how your collection is holding up, like how badly the pages from your comics from the 70s have tanned, and what steps you currently take to preserve them. I assume by Overstreet criteria they'd mostly be in the "Fine" range, right? IP: Logged |
India
Ink Member |
![]() ![]() I really have no idea. At this point I'm past caring, since if I did care it would cause me endless grief to think how badly I've treated these books. The early seventies ones, the ones with the Sandman Saga, are rather tan and there's a little tearing around the staples. Also there's a bit of tattering at the edges of some covers. Anything with black ink on the covers usually ended up with my thumb print somewhere. And 100 page Super-Spectaculars did very badly--worse yet I often tried to tape them. There was an issue of Superman (245 or somewhere around there I think) which was a Super-Spec and it had lots of black ink on the cover (Swan and Anderson did that wrap-around cover--there was a Super Chief reprint in there). Then I had the brilliant idea of subscribing to DC comics. Don't get me wrong--it was a great thrill when I heard the mailbox open and I'd hear that familiar thud, go racing down the stairs to pick up all my comics. But they were mailed folded in brown wrappers (which didn't cover the book completely) and sometimes the wrapper glue stuck to the comic. But from the late seventies on (by then I had stopped subscribing) those books are in good shape, not very tan. Still several moves and keeping them in a basement apartment for some years has not been kind to my collection. If I had taken better care in the past I might be storing these in mylar, but as it is I just keep them in the standard polybags (I use to keep them in plastic bags--unused bags provided by my mother from the Shake n Bake packages (my mother made Shake n Bake every week)). So I put them in the polybags with the backing boards and in the boxes. Taking them out of these boxes as I have been doing lately can't be too good. But like I say, if I started caring about that then I would suffer tremendous guilt. I use mostly short boxes, where before I used to use long boxes, since it's a lot easier to shift those short ones. But the post-Crisis Supermans all go into long boxes or wherever I can fit them. IP: Logged |
Village
Idiot Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() Well, if point of preservation isn't necessarily for values's sake, but rather for the ability to pass down issues to loved ones, it sounds to me like you're in pretty good shape. By Overstreet Pricing Guide standards, it sounds to me like your collection is "fair" to "very good." For a refresher on the criteria and levels, click here. From everthing I've read, polybags are fine and won't degrade the paper unless you keep them in the same bag over 2 years. Quick Village Idiot story: From early on in my collecting career, I took steps to keep my collection as mint as possible, trying to avoid comics with stress marks along the spine, etc. I knew I needed to bag my circa 1982 collection somehow, so I took some Glad cellophane bags and bagged each one. I figured I needed to seal them somehow, so I took the household iron and melted the slack on each bag, figuring a hermetic seal would keep them preserved prefectly, and left them this way for YEARS (at least a decade). Well, as you probably know, Glad bags are made out of the same polycellephane as comic bags today, and they and the comics degraded without my even realizing it. When about four years ago, I took the comics out of their sealed bags and was shocked to find they were tanned. The bags all had a yellow cast to them. Live and learn. I refer to all of my post-crisis issues as "the cannon": I only buy the best near mint issues I can find and keep them in long boxes. Some debate exists as to whether commics should be kept in rows or stacked: rows are figured to be hard on the corners, while it has been suggested that stacking leads to spine rolling. (Actually, I have no idea what REALLY causes spine rolling: I have an issue from last month whose spine is beginning to roll. Maybe it's heat. (?)) The Library on Congress stacks documents it's trying to preserve, but I think keeping them in rows in acid-free long boxes is probably best. My pre-crisis books are all "very good" to "fine." I bought some issues of Action from this era the other day to fill in a gap, and they were generally in the same condition. Maybe you remember the storyline I picked up: Satanus and his wife split Superman in half, and both Supermen half to cope with having different powers. Mostly a Wolfman story, and it's pretty cool. These comics are probably not worth that much in the long run because of their condition, but it did give me enjoyment to read them. It probably wouldn't kill you to catalog your collection at a database like wizardworld.com. Their website is pretty nifty, letting you set up an account for free that gives you the current market value of each item in your collection, and totals it, etc. It's painful, but you gotta be honest when grading the book. Anyway, like I said, the real value in the book comes from reading it, not its market price. I'm taking pains to preserve my collection in order to have something to pass down, as corny as that sounds. Of course, I wonder how my promotional Kool-Aid Man comic book fits in with that scenario? IP: Logged |
axel Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() YESSS!! I know that story where Supergirl lies to Kal-el and they go off into space. They find and rescue a crystaline alien culture I believe, and Superman gives Supergirl one of the most moving speeches I have ever read in a comic book from a fictional character, at the very end of the story. Of course, he also goes blind during the course of the story. Musn't forget. That was a brilliant story, and Supergirl was wearing my favourite outfit for her. Sigh... you guys should not be out promoting boardwide uncontrollable nostalgia in this way. Thanks! IP: Logged |
India
Ink Member |
![]() ![]() By the way I got most of my Limited Collector's Editions (and even some Treasury Editions) through the mail. They came in crush proof mailers and thus were practically mint when I received them. However I continued to keep my tabloids in these same mailers for years (until only about three years ago). They show little wear and tear, but they have a distinct tan when compared with regular comics from the same time period. I gather that the mailer's did something to cause this browning. Live and learn. Now I keep them in Life size bags--plastic, not quite what I'd like, but I can't find the polybags for this size--and I have no idea how I should store them properly--upright, flat??? Right, that's it for my talking about preservation--it's too darn depressing. Next time I come on this thread I'll try to have something to say about the Man of Tomorrow of yesterdays. IP: Logged |
axel Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() Yes please. All this talk of polybags and acid free boxes is bringing me down, damnit!. IP: Logged |
India
Ink Member |
![]() ![]() quote: It strikes me that this epic time-travelling 3 parter (Action Comics Nos. 385-387 Feb.-Apr., 1970) was the last great saga of the Weisinger era. The story brought that Superman to a conclusion and inaugurated a new (70s) Superman. Had such a story been done in the last sixteen years it would be viewed as a milestone of major consequence--if not a "Crisis" then at least a "Zero Hour," "Return to Krypton," or "Our Worlds at War." Because of the ending. Cary Bates had to know that Weisinger was soon retiring--perhaps Bates wanted to write one last great adventure about THAT Man of Tomorrow, before new editors took over the legacy with who knew what possible changes. And the ending leaves us with a temporal paradox--where 60s Superman has departed for his fate in the farflung future, 70s Superman remains behind. 70s Superman is 60s Superman to the extent that he shares some of the Weisinger legacy. But as the 70s unfolded we would see that editors and writers screened out some parts of the legend, tweaked or modified other parts, and then expanded on those aspects that interested them most. In this task of myth-making there is one individual who is easily overlooked, but should never be discounted. That person is ENB. IP: Logged |
India
Ink Member |
![]() ![]() E. Nelson Bridwell--he signed himself ENB in his letter column responses and I still don't know what the E. stood for (Encyclopedia?)--"was the first longtime comics fan to get a job at DC Comics--as Mort Weisinger's assistant editor on the seven Superman titles. The date was January 13, 1964." [Quoted from Roy Thomas, Alter Ego No. 7, Winter 2001]. Bridwell wrote some sci-fi for Jack Schiff, did little extras panels on Krypto or Superman, was a creative consultant on the Shazam TV show, created the Global Guardians, wrote the Secret Six, Shazam!, Captain Carrot, and was a major contributor to Amazing World of DC Comics. But it is as editor of many Giants and Super-Spectaculars--including most of the Superman family titles--that we should consider the Big E. here. We tend not to think about reprints when considering a particular era. It's as if they don't exist. Only the "new" material counts. Yet when I was a kid I made no distinction between what was "old" and what was "new." It was all new to me. What's more, I would gladly buy the reprints (sometimes they were better than the original material)--in the 60s you could get 80 pages for a quarter as compares with 32 regular pages for 12 cents; in the earlier 70s you could get 100 pages for four bits as compares with 32 regular pages for two dimes. The Giants and Super-Specs appeared on the same stands in amongst the regular size books. There was no "wall" between reprints and regular comics as there seems to be today. Today, reprints are packaged in high end books, and even when a facsimile 80 or 100 pager appears it's packaged to look different from the regular comics. In the early sixties, when the Giants first appeared, they were Annuals and numbered as such. Then they were 80 page Giants and numbered as such (G-1, G-2, G-3, ...), but soon enough they became part of the regular run of a title--Superman 196 was a regular size issue, 197 (G-36) was 80 pages, 198 went back to regular size. Same deal with the Super-Specs--they started out with their own numbering as a separate run (DC-1, DC-2, DC-3), but soon became part of the run of each title--Superman 244 is a regular 48 pager, 245 is 100 pages (all reprints), 246 is back to a regular 48 pages. Did I say 48 pages??? Yup. In 1971 and 1972, DC was printing all their regular books in a 48 page size (52 pages if you count the covers). The books were filled out by putting 12-16 pages of reprint material in them. As he had been responsible for the Giants and Super-Specs (for the Superman family, but increasingly for other titles as well), Bridwell had the duties thrust upon him of finding reprint stories that would fill out those 48 pagers. And while the Giants of old mainly stuck with 50s and 60s stories, in the early seventies readers were treated to a lot of rare tales from the 40s and even the 30s. In the Superman title itself, Bridwell mainly selected Superman stories from either 1940-47 or 1958-66. While with the remaining family titles, tales of family members were mostly selected from the 60s or late 50s. Then with the April-May, 1974, issue (No. 164), Superman's Pal, Jimmy Olsen, was now Superman Family--a 100 page book (including covers and ads) that usually spotlighted one family member in the lead all-new story, but filled the rest of its pages with reprint tales selected by Bridwell (although Murray Boltinoff and Joe Orlando shared the official editing chair). Eventually the size of Superman Family shrank, and then with the March-April, 1977, issue (No. 182) it became a Dollar Comic featuring all-new material. But during that period of reprints, Bridwell was able to choose the stories he wanted--those that best exemplified the Superman world. ---- Next time I pick up this thread IP: Logged |
India
Ink Member |
![]() ![]() Next time I pick up this thread I'll talk about some of those Bridwell reprints themselves and how they shaped the image of the 70s Superman. Good night. IP: Logged |
BuddyBlank Member |
![]() ![]() WAY WAY back on page 1...
quote: For the record, this page has moved to https://www.supermanthroughtheages.com/theages/History/SandSaga.html IP: Logged |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 |
NEXT PAGE |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |