![]() | |||||||||
| |||||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
Author | Topic: 80's Superman |
Aldous Member |
![]() ![]() quote: Exactly. With abasement and humiliation the name of the game, Luthor had to take his lumps like everyone else. Maybe Luthor had even further to fall than Superman. IP: Logged |
Sankoni Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() I agree with Shiuper IP: Logged |
Aldous Member |
![]() ![]() quote: I beg your pardon? IP: Logged |
India
Ink Member |
![]() ![]() ^ ^ ^ IP: Logged |
BruceWayneMan Member |
![]() ![]() I feel that the carnage in The Last Superman Story served a vital purpose - and that was to show how Superman will fight for a planet and people that aren't his own no matter what the cost to himself. Superman used to be the most tragic figure in comics - he lost his world and two sets of parents, and as much as Clark Kent might be able to pretend to fit in, he was in reality someone who could never escape the complete isolation fostered upon the last being of a dead planet. Anyways, the comments about Luthor's presentation in this story have got me wondering about how everyone regards Action 544. This was the issue where Luthor gains his new battlesuit and more importantly, features the destruction of Lexor by his own hand. This has to be the most contradictory portrayal of Luthor I've ever seen and makes me wonder if his actions were ever explained in a later issue. Lexor is the planet Luthor refused to steal from when he teamed up with Brainiac in Superman 167 and the planet where he could have killed Superman but for his concern for them. How did this Luthor become the terrorist he was in Action 544. I know the destruction of Lexor was unintentional, but he still terrorizes the planet and gleefully destroys and pillages it for no apparent reason. Anyone feel the same way, or have I missed some rational explanation? IP: Logged |
India
Ink Member |
![]() ![]() I made some passing comments about Action 544 on page 2 of this thread in reference to Heroes Against Hunger. I have no doubt that 544 is a great comic--certainly an artistic treat--but it definitely sits badly with me. By the time that issue came out I was a great fan of the Lexor stories (written by Ed Hamilton) and long desired a return to Lexor. So I was quite excited that we finally got Luthor back on Lexor, but for Bates to just use the planet as a set-up for Luthor's revenge rampage was about as bad as killing off Iris Allen to give Barry some angst. If this story had to be written it's too bad that Edmond Hamilton didn't get to write it. The way that Hamilton just suddenly disappeared from the Superman books has always left me with this unfullfilled feeling. Hamilton began so much--and then after him a lot of that was disregarded. It would have been better if Ed had had the chance in the late sixties to finish off a lot of what he had begun. If he had written the finish of Lexor it might not have been so confused. He's the one writer who truly understood Luthor. But 544 reveals that Bates never really could connect with the Luthor character--and in this issue he simply makes Lex over into the kind of character that he can write. Much the same way writers after Bates have also made over Luthor into another character that fits the type each writer is comfortable writing (various versions of The Kingpin, Ra's al Ghul, Doctor Doom, or Professor Zoom). IP: Logged |
Continental Op Member |
![]() ![]() (bump) IP: Logged |
India
Ink Member |
![]() ![]() ^ IP: Logged |
The
Progenitor Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() thanks for bringing this back guys its appreciated. IP: Logged |
India
Ink Member |
![]() ![]() I thought this (and the other topics) might prove useful for Wolfshepherd's review of "Whatever Happened to the Man of Tomorrow?" on this topic... http://dcboards.warnerbros.com/files/Forum30/HTML/011998.html IP: Logged |
India
Ink Member |
![]() ![]() I've gathered together some posts on foreign (German) editions of Superman from the early eighties. The first quote is from the "Superman in the 70s" thread, page 20, while the other posts come from "Keith Giffen Superman Story in an 80's German Comic" on the OTHER SUPERMAN TOPICS forum...
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote: IP: Logged |
India
Ink Member |
![]() ![]() Since the BIG CHANGE is supposed to happen soon, I thought it prudent to give this thread a bump NOW. IP: Logged |
Dave the
Wonder Boy Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() Superman in the 80's was mentioned in a few posts of a larger discussion of 80's material on the ODCUT boards: "Was mid to late 80's the best DC ever?" http://dcboards.warnerbros.com/files/Forum94/HTML/009215.html I don't think I've ever posted so much to a single topic. IP: Logged |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |